The
performance evaluation system of primary and secondary school principals of the EnablePPA system
is organically composed of four evaluation directions: self-evaluation of the appraisee, democratic evaluation of faculty and staff, evaluation by the assessment team, and comprehensive evaluation of leaders. Among them, democratic evaluation of faculty and staff is the core of the entire evaluation system, and the rest are Whether the evaluation in the three directions is carried out can be increased or decreased as appropriate based on the actual situation of the work. And based on different demand scenarios, the system allows the proportion of these four directions to be freely allocated in the calculation of the final assessment results. EnablePPA
allows the establishment of a universal indicator evaluation system to apply to all assessees. It can also design different evaluation indicators according to the different positions held by the assessee, and the type of position held by the assessee, such as principal, vice principal, Secretary, full-time secretary, teaching director, etc. can be freely defined in the system according to different assessment requirements. EnablePPA
's evaluation index system consists of a two-level structure: evaluation questions ( or primary indicators ) and evaluation indicators ( or secondary indicators ). Any evaluation indicator can include any number of evaluation questions and any number of evaluations. measure. In the entire indicator system, the total weight that can be assigned, the weight assigned to each indicator, the weight of each evaluation question in the corresponding indicator, and the score corresponding to each level of evaluation measure in the indicator can all be used by users based on their evaluation work real-time adjustments and revisions based on the actual situation. In other words, EnablePPA does not provide an inherent performance evaluation indicator model for primary and secondary school principals. It only provides a calculation framework for indicator design. Based on this framework, users can design their corresponding evaluations based on the actual situation of their own performance assessment. Questionnaire, and create different evaluation indicators in the evaluation questionnaire, design different evaluation questions, and give corresponding evaluation weights according to specific questions. Because of this, as a mature software system, EnablePPA can meet the needs of performance appraisal management in different scenarios.
In order to ensure that historical teaching quality evaluation data can be preserved, EnablePPA creatively uses the concept of assessment theme, which can not only distinguish between different assessment cycles, but also design a corresponding evaluation index system in each assessment cycle, and by extension, This allows multiple assessment topics to coexist in the system. Even if there is only one assessment topic currently enabled, not only can the data be viewed and exported for the original assessment topic, but the data can still be analyzed and evaluation conclusions drawn.
