The emergence of DIV+CSS eliminated a group of web design and production personnel, and created a group of web design and production personnel. Which category do you belong to? DIV+CSS has been popular for a long time, and the ones who have suffered the most are these webpage developers. I clearly remember the situation of various companies recruiting self-designed web developers at that time. DIV+CSS technology has almost become a stepping stone to finding a good job. I knew DIV for a while. +CSS people are amazing.
Pages made by tables are almost considered obsolete technology. A large number of page producers accelerated their learning of DIV+CSS technology (including myself, Lu Fujia). Because there were very few people who could write pages using this method at that time, it was very popular. During this period, two voices emerged:
The first type of person: supports DIV+CSS, separates page content and form, is smaller and opens faster... This is the future development trend, and there are almost no shortcomings.
Lu Fujia believes that the reason for support is that DIV+CSS does have certain advantages, and DIV+CSS can improve employment opportunities for such technical personnel.
The second type of people: Oppose DIV+CSS, immature, not suitable for China, complicated, not as fast as table creation....
Lu Fujia believes that the reason for the objection is that he is used to table and no longer wants to learn this kind of technology. He also points to page production to make a living, especially for website production units. Small websites use DIV+CSS to waste manpower (there are few people who know it, and the labor cost is high) and Long production time. DIV+CSS still has certain advantages in its development today. The price of pages produced by DIV+CSS is higher than that of table. This still highlights people's admiration for DIV+CSS.
Is DIV+CSS so good? Who should we listen to?
Below, Lu Fujia (himself), who has been engaged in page production and website planning for many years, will give you the answer. If there are any shortcomings, I hope you can point them out.
In website construction, we must correctly treat the emergence of new technologies. DIV+CSS has actually existed for a long time, but people have not paid attention. The choice of DIV+CSS and table should be based on the actual type of website. If page revisions are infrequent, table production is enough for small and medium-sized enterprise websites with a small number of pages. Don't follow the trend. Don't spend too much on this.
Page design and production personnel can only take advantage of the essence of DIV+CSS by mastering its essence. Blind imitation is not as good as using table. The essence of DIV+CSS lies in the ability to plan the page structure. Only with a clear structure and reasonable planning can the amount of page code be avoided. As for how to control it, that's a matter of detail. It doesn't matter how many attributes you have. The important thing is to master the design concept, which is the essence.
In fact, DIV+CSS is not difficult to learn. Many friends have asked me why the pages I created are always deformed and have no table order. The important point is that the layout planning is unreasonable. Once your layout planning ideas take shape, you can quickly master DIV+CSS.
The biggest advantage of DIV+CSS is the separation of content and form, which is very beneficial for future expansion. However, the unreasonable layout will make future expansion very troublesome and completely fail to reflect this advantage. This is also the reason why some people think that DIV+CSS is not good.
Any technology has its pros and cons, and only works that take advantage of each other's strengths are good works. That’s all I’ve written today, I hope it’s helpful to some people, thank you for reading.