In today's Internet, hard advertisements are becoming less and less accepted by everyone. It can be said that if you can't write soft articles, you will lose your competitiveness. But, what should we think about soft articles?
I can always see some so-called webmasters who are very "smart" and "just". Once there is a soft article, he will point out without hesitation: This is a soft article, the appraisal is completed! Then he will quickly "identify" other articles. It seems that his job is to help others identify soft articles.
But this is very sad. As a webmaster, especially one who is just starting out, what is your top priority? Some people say it’s a crazy external link? That's the SEO pollution I mentioned; some people say it's a good website? This answer seems a bit reliable. However, I think that before making a good website, a webmaster should learn! Often the quality of a webmaster can be reflected on his website. If you are very creative and willing to learn with an open mind, then I believe your website will be outstanding in 1 or 2 years! However, if you use your "wisdom" in other places, such as helping others identify which soft articles are soft articles, what will you gain?
I want to say that a good soft article is very creative, which takes a lot of thought from the webmaster. Why can’t we learn from it? Why do we always identify and criticize with the mentality of a "master" instead of exploring and understanding with an open mind to ask for advice? Shouldn’t you learn the subtleties of this soft article?
I believe that experienced webmasters will not easily criticize a good soft article; on the contrary, they will also recommend good soft articles as a recommendation on the homepage of the website! What is their purpose? Couldn't they see that this was a soft article? Are you more experienced than them? They actually hope that we can learn knowledge and creativity from these good soft articles. But often things don't go as planned. A large number of webmasters don't spend their time studying, but just criticize. It is very sad that we are good at being teachers and not good at being disciples.
However, this does not mean that we should not criticize online garbage. We must clearly distinguish the difference between soft articles and SEO pollution. Soft articles are creative Internet marketing articles that use very clever methods to promote their products. You can learn a lot from soft articles. SEO pollution is just posting articles to improve keyword rankings. This goes against the wishes of search engines and has no user experience. At this time, we should criticize!
Finally, I want to say, when we see a good soft article, can we put down our pride and study hard? I know that many webmasters are very smart, but smartness should be used in the right place, right?
Author: Didi Zhiquan_Xiaoyu please retain the source for reprinting: http://www.ddzq.net/?p=376
Didi Zhiquan_Xiaoyu