With the rapid development of the Internet, especially the rapid development of WEB2.0 user-generated content, governance and management issues have become more and more complex, and "blacklisting" has become a frequently used method. For example, there were two news about blacklists yesterday:
(News 1) The National Copyright Administration, the Ministry of Public Security, and the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology jointly held a press briefing and announced the launch of the 2010 "Sword Net Operation", a special campaign to combat online infringement and piracy. After this operation, a blacklist system for infringing and piracy websites will be established. The list will be published from time to time on the website of the National Copyright Administration and copied to the three major telecom operators. Telecom operators that provide access and operation services to the blacklisted websites will be held accountable for joint infringement. If the circumstances are serious, they will be criminally punished. .
(News 2) A well-known person "Looked at his Weibo blacklist, it already has 12 pages, and there are hundreds of people. This is his Weibo principle, don't work against each other if you don't agree, why should boring people chatter with him?" Including those who are not polite, rude, and feel uncomfortable, so they are blocked, so there are many people blocked. "
In the first message, it can be seen that the methods adopted for infringing and piracy websites are:
(1) “Announced after the National Copyright Administration determines it”,
(2) "The three major operators will no longer provide access." If they do, they will be held liable for joint infringement and even criminally punished. In other words, if the National Copyright Administration determines that piracy has legal benefits, the access provider must stop access.
There are four issues here:
(1) Whether the National Copyright Administration has the corresponding law enforcement qualifications, even if the National Copyright Administration has the corresponding authorization;
(2) Not only the three major operators are access providers, this website may be located abroad, and the three major operators may not be able to provide access;
(3) Many websites provide user uploading. If the content uploaded by a user is pirated, there is no clear statement here on how to handle it;
(4) If the website operator believes that the suspension of access is illegal or unreasonable, who should he complain to?
Whether it is appropriate to do so is not said. But there is a very clear problem here, that is, after the blacklist here was stopped, the people who committed the infringement (that is, those who profited from piracy) did not receive corresponding punishment. The cost of building a website is very, very low. The infringer is likely to build multiple websites at the same time, or launch a brand new website once the website is blacklisted and stopped. Such a blacklist does not effectively combat illegal and criminal activities, and as the blacklist continues to lengthen, the governance effect will become worse and worse.
In the second message, the celebrity put hundreds of people on Weibo's blacklist, which is even more interesting. Put the other party on the blacklist, but the other party cannot automatically receive the Weibo posts you send by adding you as a friend. In other words, you said that people on the blacklist are not allowed to see it directly, but these people can still You can see the content you posted by forwarding or commenting on it from your friends, or you can see all the Weibo posts you posted by directly entering your Weibo address. At the same time, you can no longer see the content he posts, and you will not enter his Weibo address to see his Weibo posts. Your ears are clear, but you can't see different voices. As the old saying goes, listening will tell. You gave up a rare opportunity.
In fact, if you don’t like someone’s words, just ignore them. Even if they reply to your Weibo, unless they are really “framing”, just ignore them. If you don’t respond, he will be boring. There is also a saying As the old saying goes, "a slap can't make a difference", you don't have to "catch up" at all.
Back to the blacklist, with the rapid development of the Internet and mobile communications, there are more blacklists, including email blacklists, mobile phone blacklists, small advertising blacklists, spam text message blacklists, website blacklists... At present, these blacklists The list does play a somewhat administrative role, but it works very effectively. The reason is very simple. This approach "treats the symptoms but not the root cause". If an email address is blacklisted, the same spam emails will also be received. The reason is that the cost of obtaining a new email address is extremely low, and the sender can make huge profits, and the current management mechanism, there is basically no loss to it.
Only by breaking off the chain of interests and making illegal profit-seekers pay a heavy price for their actions can we truly curb these illegal activities through the Internet and telecommunications networks. And establishing a blacklist is just a stupid method, far from being a panacea.
China will establish a blacklist system for infringing and piracy websites