Countless "experts" have preached to us the importance of originality and continuous updates for website optimization. Today I plan to go against it.
Putting order out of chaos: search engines simply can’t tell the difference between originality and originality.
Proof: There are almost no domestic websites that are not "reprinted". Has anyone seen a search engine refuse to include them? In fact, many pages ranked in front of the SERP have the same content. If the search engine can distinguish originality from non-originality, not only Reprinting will be effectively curbed, and many problems will no longer exist.
One voice: There is no need to blindly measure new website updates.
Analysis: Search engines crawl new websites irregularly. 10 articles are updated every day, and only one may be included by the search engine in the end. It takes time to be original, pseudo-original or completely copied. Before the search engine starts to crawl the website normally, updating 10 articles every day takes time, and the search engine will not immediately give the new website normal inclusion treatment. In this case, Why bother?
"Experts" also said that new websites should not be over-optimized and pay attention to content construction.
Different views: Excessive content construction is also a type of over-optimization
As long as there are no logical obstacles, you should know that content construction is also a way of optimization. Crazy updates every day should also be classified as excessive optimization. Since over-optimization is unavoidable, you might as well do the opposite: in the early stages of building a website, put more energy into SEO, and keep the content updated at a steady and small frequency. SEO can bring long-term optimization effects. Adding a lot of content to a new website may not necessarily lead to normal treatment by search engines.
Which one to choose? Self-explanatory.
Author: Chengdu SEO
Source: http://yeeseo.com