Many people say that DIV+CSS is good for SEO, but in fact, as long as it is a DIV+CSS web page, is it good for search engines to include it? Obviously not.
The biggest advantage of DIV+CSS compared to Table is that it eliminates the confusing semantics of Table. In the past, if Table layout was used, any element would need to be nested by these three tags, resulting in the search engine being unable to accurately locate the primary and secondary content when analyzing the page content. relation. The biggest function of the DIV+CSS separated layout is to let the HTML tags nested by the table tag jump out of the frame and leave the page layout to CSS.
Many people misunderstand this and think that DIV+CSS means replacing the Table tag with a DIV tag. As a result, the Table series tags are gone and replaced by DIVs that fill the page. We often see applications like this appearing on some website pages:
<div class="title"><h1>xx website</h1></div>To put it in a cheesier way, this is like taking off your pants to fart - unnecessary. div is just one of many block tags, h1 is also a block tag, so nested, what is the final difference from Table? Why is DIV+CSS good for search engines? It’s because DIV+CSS can describe web pages in a clean and concise language elements, thereby reducing the page size. If a webpage using DIV+CSS layout still cannot escape the layers of nested red tape, not only will it fail to reduce the page size successfully, but it may not be easy for search engines to parse.
Now many people talk about div+css when it comes to SEO, but few people actually take advantage of div+css in SEO. In this way, it is easy to understand that your DIV+CSS webpage does not rank as high on search engines as other people's TABLE layout webpages.
Please indicate the source for reprinting: http://7topics.com