Always remember that Baidu serves its users, not Baidu cramps. The specific reason is not known, but it should be Baidu adjusting the algorithm. However, the results of this algorithm test are not in line with the search experience of Baidu users. This means that the last adjustment was a failed algorithm. Or immature. But it does not mean that Baidu will not mention this algorithm again in the future, or in a week or January, or even within a year. They are also testing, testing, testing to provide Baidu users with a reliable information, allowing users to get a better search experience.
But every time Baidu adjusts its algorithm, everyone will see some clues in various aspects, and Baidu makes no regular adjustments there. It is a ranking compiled by Baidu by balancing various data on the website. Don't just say "Baidu cramps" and get pulled over. Analyze the data, analyze the rankings, analyze which elements dominated Baidu's last ranking, which elements occupied a secondary position, and why this is the case. What is the result he wants to show to users? Why is he doing this? Why can't it be done this way? This major adjustment just reflects these problems. Who are the friends who collect this data? If you can stand up, I will reply to the post. Real SEO experts are doing this quietly. They will pay attention to these data all the time and pay attention to collecting information in this area. What I tell you here are some ways to advance in learning SEO. Don't just be fooled by superficial phenomena. If you only see the results and don't understand the process, you will never advance if you learn SEO. You can only hover at one level.
Our website has been improved every time. It should be like this. Many people in the forum have been saying such things recently. The facts have proved my guess.
We can proudly say:
SEO controls search engines. If it weren't for our SEO, Baidu would not provide users with the best search results. This SEO victory over Baidu is just a small beginning for the development of search engines in the future.
[b]I am talking about a method.
The ancients said: "It is better to teach a man to fish than to teach him to fish."
I see that the people who replied are all from JJYY. It’s really hard to understand. It’s too impetuous to study, which is not a good thing.
From the first online earning forum (http://www.spuw.cn)