Today I accidentally searched a post by p8 from Baidu
http://bbs.php168.com/read-bbs-tid-238565.html
I am also engaged in this industry. I spent a few hours and carefully looked at 163k.com and their products. I was very impressed, so I registered an account and wrote down my thoughts.
1. 163k’s products are indeed very strong and practical. It can be seen that they have put a lot of effort into every detail. From the following four websites, you can see their design and art strength. It is no exaggeration to say that at present, It’s rare to see someone with this kind of ability in the industry (we have two artists in our company, and they make more than 4,000 a month. Their skills are terrible, and they are so bad all day long)
http://www.163k.com (portal product station)
http://www.163k.com/tuangou/ (Group buying product site)
http://tg.163k.com (Group buying system demonstration)
http://mh.163k.com (portal system demonstration)
Especially the portal system, I think it is particularly suitable for use in small and medium-sized local cities today. Although I don’t know how their code is written, in terms of design, planning, and channels, it is really great. I envy it!
2. The biggest highlight of 163k is also the most worthy of our discussion. It takes the project route and does not make general-purpose source code (like cms). It is dedicated to packaging an Internet project. I feel that it is currently lacking. That's it. Nowadays, most system vendors are taking the technical source code route. Should we let the project decide what system to build, or just do the source code, and the project is decided by the customer (the disadvantage of this is that the customer must redesign the source code template, Modules and secondary development are suitable for your own projects. In fact, not many people have this strength and technology, causing many people who want to operate website projects to be at a loss)
3. I feel that there is no shortage of technical talents now. What is lacking is design and planning talents. Only good planning can provide technical guidance, otherwise technology will be just stagnant.
4. Products should not be made and designed only from a technical perspective and perspective.
5. The website is ultimately for ordinary netizens. They don’t care how powerful your source code technology is or how powerful its functions are. What they focus on is whether the interface is good, practical and user-friendly. Should we pay more attention to the key points? What about this.
This article is by no means a soft article. Please be kind to those who reply and don't just reply to "ad", "soft article" and "gunner" all day long. Can't we discuss other people's things?