We know that once a newspaper submission is adopted, there will be a royalties. But if you submit your manuscript online, there will be no royalties. But there will always be benefits. Because every article must be signed with the author's name and promote the product. Invisibly, you can promote yourself. Any news that we often publish that does not involve major political, military, or social events is called soft news. Many people think that soft articles are soft advertisements. This view is one-sided and wrong.
Does a soft article count as an article? Of course it counts as an article; does a soft article have a copyright? Of course it does. Some people may say, isn’t soft article an advertisement? Of course not, it only contains advertising functions; some may say, isn’t Internet article copyright-free? If you excerpt mine and I will reprint yours, who will determine the copyright? Although there is no copyright fee, But copyrights and copyrights still exist and must be respected. Copyright, also called authorship, refers to the rights that authors of literary, artistic, and scientific works have over their works. There are two ways to obtain copyright: automatic acquisition and registration acquisition. In our country, according to the copyright law, copyright automatically becomes available upon completion of the work. The so-called completion is relative. As long as the object of creation meets the statutory conditions for the composition of a work, it can be protected by copyright law as a work.
When it comes to copyright, no one can do anything about the chaos of copyright protection on the Internet. As a general rule, I basically default to others copying the entire article. Internet authors welcome others to quote entire sentences and entire paragraphs, but look down on others to quote entire chapters and adopt entire articles as their own. Isn’t that using other people’s efforts to reward yourself? When you step on other people’s shoulders, don’t you have to ask others if they are willing?
I accidentally browsed the webmaster website chinaz today, and there was an article on the homepage that was published in the chinaz forum on July 3 that caught my attention. This article is called "How can non-mainstream websites survive without search engines?" (See: "Webmaster Club" column on Chinaz homepage). Such a familiar title, isn’t it an article with the same title that we published on Admin5 on July 2? (See: How can non-mainstream websites survive without search engines ). And when we saw the end of the article, the signature of the article was: Moudian.com. We felt very strange at the time, why was the signature not Yanhuang Internet? Isn’t this our article? Later we thought: By the way, this is the webmaster website, not the webmaster website. Our article was published on the webmaster website (Admin5) , so it’s strange that this article appears on Chinaz. The reasons can only be: plagiarism and name theft. We also have an exclusive blog in Chinaz and publish articles on Chinaz, but because Chinaz’s review standards for articles may be too high, we still like to publish more articles on Admin5. We only published this article on our own website www.yhlink.com and the webmaster website www.admin5.com, and the publication date (July 2) can prove that it appeared on the webmaster website on July 3 Articles on www.chinaz.com infringe the copyright of Yanhuang Internet.
From the bottom of my heart, it's not worth taking this matter seriously. We have many things to do and are busy with business, so we don’t have time to think too much about this so-called copyright issue. In the final analysis, it is just an article. But the fleeting thoughts always make us feel uncomfortable. A person must have personality, and a webmaster must have an Internet conscience. Let me use A5 to appeal: Please respect the copyright of online articles. You must obtain the consent of the original author for quoting or reprinting. At least, you must sign the original author's name instead of your own name. Internet articles may lack legal sanctions, but they will never lack Internet conscience. Internet authors can use the weapons of Internet ethics to protect themselves. In response to the plagiarism practices of a certain website, we only express regret for the behavior of our colleagues; in response to the bad habits of plagiarism on the Internet, we use A5 to express our strong opposition. When we publish articles, we occasionally search through search engines and find that most reprinted websites will include the original author's name at the end of the citation. However, there are also people who look down upon websites and “appropriate” articles as their own, putting aside their Internet conscience. We always think that such a website will have trouble sooner or later and will collapse sooner or later.
Others can reprint the entire article intact, but please consider the author's hard work in writing. Most Internet writers are unpaid, they just work for a certain ideal without any sacrifice.
I admire Zhang Zhengjun a lot. He said: If someone can publish an article on your website without asking for compensation, it should be fine if they put a link at the end of the article (to this effect). Therefore, in terms of human rules, Admin5 is a good place for all Internet experts, authors and webmasters to publish articles. It is not only considerate of authors, but also has the characteristics of fast inclusion by search engines.
Other webmaster sites, such as Chinaz, have high standards for collecting articles that will make it difficult for people with average literary talent to find the threshold. However, their articles and their author's blogs have a high weight in search engines; as a forum format, the threshold for publishing articles is low. It is very low. As long as it is not illegal, it can be published and the impact will be great. However, the practice of not allowing authors, especially original authors, to be signed is too impersonal and prohibitive. We once published an original article on the outdated forum, and signed it as usual at the end. Yanhuang Internet, the article was immediately deleted and the ID was blocked. Although the approach is understandable, it is too inhumane. We have published articles in many forums and found that good moderators always have an effective management method. Their methods are very humane and can retain returning traffic: for example, moving articles posted to the wrong place and giving prompts, giving warnings instead of kicking people when deleting articles; giving approval with signatures at the end of original articles, and giving warnings with signatures when replying to trolls. The practice of deleting IDs when you want to see signatures is probably due to the personal preferences of individual moderators, and it is not the original intention. Otherwise, being outdated will really become outdated.
That's off topic. As usual, please declare: If you agree to the article being reprinted, please include the author information: Yanhuang Internet.