Regarding the "Taizhou Primitive Network" incident, I believe everyone has heard about it, another IDC vendor who took the money and ran away. The problem of Internet integrity is comparable to social integrity in reality, and someone is urgently needed to pay for it. This "primitive man" incident is not the first, and it will certainly not be the last. The people who suffer the most are ordinary webmasters. The websites that they have worked so hard to run disappear as soon as they are said to disappear. Not only are they directly affected by the economic impact Loss, and even more physical and mental strain. Conscientious IDC merchants, how can you tolerate this?
The integrity issue of the Internet, especially the integrity issue of the IDC industry, is not a one-day or two-day demand of the industry. It is just that industry standards have not been formulated for a long time. Webmasters have to suffer losses again. After experiencing this "primitive man" incident, is it possible? Shouldn’t relevant departments urgently issue relevant laws and regulations?
However, the IDC industry is not as easy to formulate industry standards as other industries in real life. If industry standards were easy to formulate, I believe there would not be so many industry problems at present. The virtual, free, and extensive attributes of the Internet determine the rapid development of the network, but at the same time, it also brings many hidden dangers to network security. Industry standards require the joint efforts of all links and conscious compliance. Only when the industry is standardized can the entire industry develop well.
1 Relevant departments should strengthen supervision and conduct regular inspections.
The IDC industry has low entry barriers and low capital investment. For domain names and hosting, you only need one server and a domain name agent; for server hosting and leasing, you only need to rent a cabinet in the computer room and buy a few cheap servers. Start running. At present, there are many IDC companies, but the good and bad vary. It is difficult for users to distinguish between them. They are often confused by advertising or appearances, resulting in losses. Relevant departments should strengthen supervision of these enterprises and carry out regular inspections; disputes and complaints in the industry should be handled in a timely manner, and enterprises that have been complained repeatedly and refuse to mend their ways should be punished with closure. If the industry wants to develop, it must be continuously improved. Survival of the fittest is the law of the industry. In addition, relevant departments must strictly control the filing of IDC websites, and not every application will issue a "business license". With the relevant departments strengthening supervision, users will have fewer IDC providers to choose from, and security will be relatively guaranteed.
2. Supervision among peers should be strengthened.
As the saying goes, when peers meet, they are extremely jealous. The relationship between IDC companies is competition for users, which is an obvious confrontation of interests. If peers can strengthen supervision, the entire industry will be more perfect. Of course, there may be vicious competition here, supervise and report each other. Some methods are more upright, while others may use illegal means. For example, in the case of the "Primitive Man" incident this time, according to people familiar with the matter, the Prime Minister had transferred all its servers as early as June 20. Isn't there any noise among the industry about such a disturbance? Now, the webmaster is facing a disaster It has already happened. If other IDC companies can unite to help the webmasters who were "injured" in this incident and do more charity activities, I believe they will be recognized by more ordinary webmasters. Although there were some financial losses, it increased influence and visibility among webmasters.
3 Grassroots webmasters should unite to protect their rights.
The number of webmasters who suffered losses in the "Primitive Man" incident is being counted. It is not yet known how many people suffered losses or the amount of losses. IDC is the core part of the website, and the website data is in it. If the data is lost, it means that the website has to start from scratch, which will be a huge blow to the webmaster. One webmaster said it well, the biggest pain for a webmaster is not that the website is hacked or demoted by Baidu, but that the website that he has worked so hard to manage cannot be opened. After all, the power of an individual webmaster is limited. If all webmasters who have suffered losses can unite and defend their rights together, even if they cannot recover all losses, they can still vent their anger. We must know that the power of the masses is infinite, and webmasters must unite the front to safeguard their own rights and interests.
Webmaster website admin5.com Meng Jiang warned webmasters to keep their eyes open when choosing IDC service providers. After all, you can’t have your cake and eat it too, and integrity, service, quality, and price cannot be completely unified. What you choose should be based on It depends on your own situation. There may be risks in choosing any IDC company, but if you encounter problems, you must unite and protect your rights together.
For IDC service providers, do not ignore the interests of webmasters for immediate benefits. You must be honest as a person, especially on the Internet. Only when the entire industry develops can IDC service providers maximize their own interests. For the Internet-related departments, it is fundamental to worry less about the "Green Dam" issue and deal with more facts, and not to take taxpayers' money but not take it seriously. As the ancients said, "The person in his position will seek his job." I hope to see relevant departments doing more facts and talking less empty words.
[Daily Debate] Does network integrity need to be enforced?