This picture is normal and there is no plagiarism. Could it be that all the same things are plagiarism?
I saw something mentioned above about layout and detail display. I can only say that such things have no copyright protection. Even if I feel that the other party may be imitating me, it doesn't make sense to say so. This kind of segmented layout has been around for more than ten years ago, and the detailed display of a large picture is also very common in graphic design and albums. Bald is not the first to invent it. Anyone may use these common elements. One day, someone else may accuse me of plagiarism based on their feeling, and another day someone may accuse me of plagiarism based on their feeling. Neither side has concrete evidence, so it makes no sense to just throw dirty water at each other. Just like in many novels, there are CEOs named Su/Lu/Gu who have stomach problems and don’t like to laugh. The plot involves chasing his wife in the crematorium. The elements are the same, but the specific plot is different and the text description is different. It cannot be said to be plagiarism. Otherwise, there will only be one domineering article in the world. At present, when it comes to plagiarism, the only thing that everyone can recognize is the overlapping of pictures/very special content that can definitely guarantee originality.
However, the specific composition and character movements are still different. I think it’s quite reasonable to draw the elements of a left-hand drive convertible from this perspective. If you draw the front angle of the car, you won’t have the feeling that the male protagonist invites you to get in the car, and it’s even impossible to draw the male protagonist’s back...
All the poses that can be drawn in the second game are very similar. You don’t have to say that the poses are similar, so it’s plagiarism????
It’s not considered plagiarism, but the precision and completion on the right are quite perfunctory.
Well, I don’t know if it counts as plagiarism, but it’s true that the elements overlap.
At first glance, I saw that they were two different games, and I didn’t see any similarity at all. . .
Although I may not mean it that way, I think it’s better not to say such words that can easily be misunderstood.
Moreover, this is the first time that he has shown the layout details of the card face. Before, he only had pure card faces.
Um...this is considered plagiarism...