In the past two days, the topic of website registration and on-site photography has been discussed again. Compared with the previous theoretical discussions, it is now "news on May 12 that we learned from the domestic website access provider that the website registration and photography work has begun the formal implementation stage." I don't know what the "formal implementation" will be this time. To what extent it will be implemented, after all, most people are still waiting and watching, and do not have much favorable impressions of this policy.
The on-site photography system does not have a mass base and may be difficult to implement.
The on-site photography system was not favored as soon as it was proposed, and IT professionals wrote articles expressing their dissatisfaction and unreliability. The Internet is a virtual platform for online communication and cannot be restricted and restricted by traditional management methods. The on-site photography system does not take into account the open, real-time, and virtual characteristics of the Internet. Although on-site photography ensures the authenticity of the website owner’s information to a certain extent, it also consumes huge material and financial resources and is not a feasible solution. The on-site photography system has always been rejected since it was proposed. This time it has been proposed again and "has begun the formal implementation stage." I don't know if it is a coercive measure.
Strengthening the supervision of the Internet is a good thing, and everyone actively supports and responds to it, but supervision must be implemented through feasible plans. Since the Internet rectification campaign in the second half of 2009, the rectification measures have not been very satisfactory, and the results after the rectification have not been very significant. Although this time's on-site photography has reached the stage of formal implementation, there are still very few applicants. In a poll on the Admin5 forum, "The on-site photography system has made waves again. Have you ever experienced on-site photography?", none of the 27 people who participated in the vote had experienced it. Another 16 people said, "If we really want to take on-site photography, I won’t make a website anymore.” The original intention of the photo policy makers is good, in order to better supervise and maintain the network environment, but the method is not very satisfactory, and the on-site photo system may be difficult to implement.
Purifying the network environment requires a long-term and effective supervision mechanism.
If we use the stock market to describe China's Internet, it has been a bear market for the Internet from the second half of 2009 until now, with unclear policies and rectification campaigns that have continued until now. The entire Internet lacks long-term and stable policies, and policies change day by day. For example, individual registration of .CN domain names has gone from being popularized at 1 yuan to prohibiting individuals from registering CN domain names, and then allowing individuals to register CN domain names with conditions. By April this year, "the total number of CN domain names fell below 10 million and dropped by nearly 4 million in three months." Most individual webmasters have lost confidence in CN domain names. After the high-profile launch of the CN domain name, it received widespread publicity from the media, and many preferential policies were also introduced. In order to support the development of the CN domain name, many people registered. But later the policy was adjusted, and many CN domain name owners were hurt, so they abandoned the CN domain name one after another. Policy changes too quickly.
There is no rule without rules, but supervision requires a reasonable means. China's Internet has not yet formed a stable supervision mechanism and is still being explored. The Internet in the West has taken longer to develop and its management is relatively complete. Chinese managers should learn more from Western models and formulate and form stable management policies as soon as possible. For example, should the website registration system be in line with international standards and lift this restriction in a timely manner? For example, should some sensitive topics on the Internet be properly guided and supported instead of blindly suppressed and blocked? For example, should the intensity of management be continuously controlled to a certain level? In terms of level and intensity, instead of just fixing the problem when there is a problem, one size fits all; for example, should there be more support and encouragement policies for individuals to do website work, and carry forward the spirit of a hundred flowers blooming and a hundred schools of thought contending, such as...
China's Internet started late and developed quickly, and its policies are not yet perfect, which we can understand. As ordinary netizens and individual webmasters, we hope to have a stable environment. We support the management and supervision of relevant departments, but we also hope that the management method can be more scientific, effective and transparent, and seek truth from facts based on reality, rather than one size fits all. One-sided management. I hope that policy implementers can hear this voice. As long as the policy is scientific and effective, it will naturally gain the support and compliance of netizens, purify the Internet environment, and realize the sustainable development of China's Internet. This is the dream of all people. (Text/Mengjiang)