When it comes to the "on-site photography" registration system, 99% of webmasters will oppose it. This policy is almost unfeasible and very inhumane. I have seen many articles criticizing the on-site photography system. The recent article "Who hinders college students from starting their own online entrepreneurship" is a very satirical view of "on-site photography", which makes readers feel happy after reading it. No matter for individual webmasters, local IDC operators, or managers, the on-site photography system is not ideal.
On-site photography is time-consuming, laborious and expensive for individual webmasters. Many people have discussed this before, so I won’t go into details here. Some webmasters asked, why do IDC operators not oppose this policy and do not speak for webmasters? Come to think of it, IDC operators in each province have no say. After the policy is implemented, no IDC company dares not to implement it. If the policy is really strictly implemented, webmasters will have no choice but to look far away for the near. As a result, IDC will inevitably lose many customers; and once the collected filing information is untrue and problems arise, IDC will not be able to escape accountability. Thinking rationally, if "on-site photography" is truly implemented, it will also be a huge loss for each IDC operator. The on-site photography system is not IDC’s fault.
We cannot verify who is the initiator of "on-site photography", but under the influence of coercion, any policy may be implemented. In the past two days, I heard rumors that "the national college BBS forums may be re-integrated and managed uniformly." The specific situation is unknown. For various colleges and universities, BBS is a network platform for students to discuss and communicate. If they want to be integrated and unified, how can I hear it? Not a good taste. It feels wrong to those with discerning eyes, but for some departments, it is extremely important to strengthen the supervision of netizens’ public opinion and purify online platforms. If unified management of college BBSs is really implemented, it seems that it will not be far away to strengthen the supervision of personal websites and the establishment of a real-name system. For any Internet user, we all hope to have a harmonious network environment, but the implementation of the on-site photography system for personal websites only treats the symptoms but not the root cause and cannot play any practical role. What's the point of mobilizing troops and people to carry out such a useless effort that wastes people and money?
In the Admin5 forum’s topic chat every Thursday at 3-4 pm, representatives of IDC operators from various provinces will be invited to “discuss the website registration method of ‘on-site photography’” on May 27, which has attracted the attention of many webmasters. Regardless of whether they are individual webmasters or various IDC operators, they are only targets of execution. Some webmasters even said, "There is no need to discuss this topic at all. Everyone understands that this stuff is bullshit." Although the grassroots cannot stop it In the implementation of policies, it is necessary to shout out the voices of the grassroots and convey them to the ears of certain people as effectively as possible. Only then can it be possible to change from passive to active, and only then can it be possible to change the status quo. Maybe the discussion will not achieve any practical effect, but at least we will try hard to fight for our legitimate rights and interests. In Thursday’s forum chat, let’s take a look at which provinces have started taking photos on site and which ones are still waiting to see. How can webmasters rationally face this policy? More people are welcome to join the discussion. Let’s shout together!
Philosophy tells us that theory should be combined with practice; predecessors have said that without investigation, there is no right to speak. The survey concluded that we had a question about whether theory should be combined with practice before policy formulation. The online real-name system cannot be solved by taking photos on the spot. Or fundamentally speaking, does the real-name system make sense? The Internet has told us from the beginning that this is a virtual platform, but we have to use the standard scale of real society to measure it. This method is wrong from the beginning. We are still discussing to what extent "on-site photography" will be implemented. We hope to convey more different voices to let more people hear and pay attention to individual webmaster groups. We also hope that policymakers can find a more scientific and reasonable regulatory system as soon as possible in order to establish a good network environment. (Text/Mengjiang)