Recently, my friend, I opened a new personal website - "Survival Network". Of course, the source of content mainly relies on collection. During this period of time, I have been worrying about the traffic of the survival network. I saw that everyone is keen on pseudo-original works. I couldn’t help but feel itchy. I also created some pseudo-original works on my "survival network". The result was not as optimistic as I imagined. The theory in the article about how to fake originality is that “pseudo-original work is regarded as original by search engines, and if a fake article is published, Baidu will include it” is not consistent.
I can guarantee that my fake article complied with the production essentials of fake originality. The first paragraph, last paragraph, and middle paragraph are all different from the original text, and there have been many changes. However, the recent analysis results are not very satisfactory - I found that Baidu also At the beginning, I updated it every day when I was pseudo-original, but later I didn’t update it very much, so I became suspicious of the pseudo-original theory. At the same time, because the pseudo-original work was too tiring, it took more than 15 minutes to write a serious pseudo-original article, including modifications and inspections. However, I started to research various pseudo-original tools and tried several tools. I found that the effect was not very good. Synonyms and antonyms are replaced, etc. After the replacement, the sentence reads very awkwardly and does not conform to popular language habits. Personally, I think it may be okay to use various pseudo-original tools to deceive search engines, but for users it is definitely a waste of time. For a personal website like me that is serious about building a website and wants to win the reputation of users, I disdain to use these junk tools. I still want to buy such a rubbish tool! Don’t even give it to me, I don’t want to dig my own grave for my beloved “survival network”.
Handmade pseudo-original creation is the only way to quickly create original creations. I heard that quite a few of the articles on big sites are pseudo-original. I think that if big sites are doing so well and are so popular among users, their pseudo-original articles must not be pseudo-original using tools. In order to improve user experience and search engine inclusion, they It must be handmade and pseudo-original, and the quality of its pseudo-original articles must be very high. At this point, I can’t wait to see what technology the big website’s pseudo-original articles have used to make the pseudo-original articles so good.
Personally, I admire Ruili Women’s Network (it’s suspected of advertising, don’t forget to pay advertising fees for Ruili.com, and free friend links are fine, haha), so I started researching on this site.
How to study it? You must first find the pseudo-original articles on Ruili.com. How to determine whether they are pseudo-original articles? If it is an old article that has been published for a long time, if you search the article title in Baidu, it is really difficult to tell whether it is an original article from Ruili faked from another site or an original article faked from another site faked Ruili. So how do you find Ruili’s pseudo-original articles? Hehe, I thought of it, and you must have thought of it too, right? right! Just compare the latest articles she published today with Baidu search results. If her article ranks first, it means her article is original, otherwise it is pseudo-original. So I used this method to randomly find a few newly published pseudo-original articles on her, and then compared the two articles.
The results of the research surprised me: I thought Ruili must have put in a lot of effort and changed the article a lot to make it both popular for search engines and readers. But the result of the research is that Ruili did not modify a word of the original article, but only modified it. Because these original articles only have pure text, they are not reader-friendly enough. Based on the original work, Ruili divided it into many pages. Different pictures related to the theme were inserted at the head of each page. At the same time, the content of the article was rearranged (the order of the paragraphs did not change, that is, it was consistent with the original text), so that The article format looks fresh and natural. After the entire article is revised, it gives people the impression that it is a high-quality article. After a glance, people will naturally have the desire to read.
This can be regarded as the difference between fake originality on big websites and ordinary websites. The reason why a big website can become a big website is because of its work style and attitude. I hope this article can give some inspiration to webmasters who want to engage in pseudo-original creations and those who are currently engaging in pseudo-original creations.
Author's website: Survival Network ( http://www.kenkenboy.com ), welcome to reprint! Please retain our information when reprinting.
Thanks to zfqcn for his contribution