As the 2024 U.S. election approaches, generative AI technology and its application in elections have attracted widespread attention. Downcodes editors will give you an in-depth understanding of how AI technology affects elections, as well as the measures taken by states and the federal government to avoid AI abuse. This article will analyze the potential risks of AI in elections, and explore the shortcomings of current legal supervision, as well as more comprehensive and effective regulatory measures that may be needed in the future. Let’s explore the future of AI technology and democratic elections.
As the 2024 US election approaches, the rapid development of AI technology has attracted more and more attention. Recently, Axios analysis showed that at least 26 states have passed or are considering laws to regulate the use of generative AI in elections. This means that in future elections, AI will no longer be a simple technical tool, but a "game changer" that may affect voting results.
Picture source note: The picture is generated by AI, and the picture authorization service provider Midjourney
It is known that generative AI can sometimes be used for malicious purposes and may even cause voter confusion and suppression. Virginia Senator Mark Warner pointed out in an email that the risk of misuse of AI technology cannot be underestimated. He said: "I think the companies and platforms developing generative AI do not pay enough attention to the potential for abuse." This has caused many people to worry about whether the use of AI will affect the fairness of democratic elections.
In fact, there have been multiple instances where generative AI has been used to mislead voters. For example, in New Hampshire, someone used AI-generated fake phone calls to imitate Biden's voice to encourage Democratic voters not to participate in the primary. In July last year, a super political action committee supporting Florida Governor DeSantis also used AI to imitate Trump's voice to create ads to attack him. These incidents have made people realize that the misuse of AI has become a problem that cannot be ignored.
Although some states have begun to take action, such as Texas becoming the first state in 2019 to ban the production and distribution of deepfake videos targeting candidates, regulatory measures regarding AI at the federal level remain limited. Even President Biden’s executive order on AI is mainly voluntary and lacks enforcement.
Currently, 19 states have passed laws specifically regulating AI-generated “deepfake” media. Among them, California’s law prohibits the dissemination of “substantially deceptive” audio and video content within 60 days before an election, while Minnesota and Michigan prohibit the dissemination of AI-generated deep fake content within 90 days before an election in 2023. In addition, New Mexico, Florida, Utah and others also passed laws this year requiring the disclosure of AI-generated content.
While some states consider certain exceptions when considering relevant laws, such as if the content contains disclosures, or if it is satire and parody advertising, states still differ in the classification and penalties for violations. As more states take action, experts say a true solution to the problem will require comprehensive action at the federal level.
** Highlights: **
? ** At least 26 states are considering or have passed laws regulating the use of generative AI in elections. **
? **Instances of AI technology being used maliciously are common, including fake phone calls and ads that mimic candidate voices. **
** Currently, regulatory measures at the federal level are relatively limited, and laws vary from state to state. A more comprehensive legal framework is urgently needed. **
All in all, the application of AI technology in elections is a double-edged sword, bringing both convenience and risk. In order to ensure the fairness and justice of elections, it is urgent to strengthen supervision at the federal level and unify legal standards across states. The editor of Downcodes calls on relevant departments and institutions to actively respond to this challenge and formulate more complete laws and regulations to ensure the transparency and fairness of elections.