More and more Fortune 500 companies in the United States mention generative artificial intelligence in their financial reports. However, there are hidden risks and opportunities in this. A new analysis shows that although the number of companies mentioning generative AI has increased significantly, the focus of most companies is not its positive application prospects, but the potential risks and challenges. This raises concerns about how companies view and apply this emerging technology, and how to balance innovation and risk.
A recent analysis shows that more and more Fortune 500 companies in the United States are mentioning generative artificial intelligence (AI) in their financial reports, but not all of them are positive.
According to research from Arize, the number of such mentions has increased by 250% since 2022, with about 22% of companies mentioning generative AI or large language models in their reports. But what is worrying is that nearly 70% of companies mentioned risk-related content, including competitive position and security risks, as well as the possibility of misinformation spreading.
Picture source note: The picture is generated by AI, and the picture is authorized by the service provider Midjourney
In financial reports, companies are required to disclose known or potential risks, which explains why so many mentions of generative AI do not extoll the benefits it brings. In fact, as many as 56% of companies clearly regard AI as a potential risk, an increase of 474% from 2022. Comparatively, only 31% of companies mentioned the positive impact of generative AI in their reports, which may cause some companies to miss the opportunity to market AI adoption to investors.
For example, S&P Global mentioned in its 10-K filing on December 31, 2023 that the popularity of generative artificial intelligence may significantly increase people’s access to publicly available information, thereby affecting the demand for their products and services. Motorola's report also mentioned that as the company gradually integrates AI into its products, it may suffer reputational damage due to social and ethical issues. Motorola emphasized that even if they have an AI governance program and a technical oversight committee, they may still suffer competitive harm or negative publicity due to inconsistent application of the technology.
Nonetheless, there are some positive examples in the analysis. For example, Quest Diagnostics mentioned in its financial documents that in 2023 they launched a generative AI program with the goal of improving software engineering, customer service, claims analysis, and other areas. Quest said that in the future they hope to achieve innovation and business growth through generative AI while ensuring safety and responsibility.
Highlight:
About 22% of Fortune 500 companies mentioned generative AI, but 70% were talking about risks.
⚠️ More than half of companies see AI as a potential risk, with only 31% mentioning its benefits.
One exception is Quest Diagnostics, which is using generative AI to drive innovation and growth.
All in all, generative AI has both opportunities and challenges in enterprise applications. Enterprises need to carefully assess risks and formulate corresponding response strategies in order to fully realize the potential of AI and achieve sustainable development. While actively embracing AI, we need to pay more attention to its potential risks in order to move forward steadily in the technological wave.