Recently, accusations that Kingsoft’s WPS Office office software was suspected of sharing user documents to ByteDance’s Doubao AI for training have sparked heated discussions on social media. Many users reported that the contents of their unpublished documents were cited by Doubao AI, raising serious concerns about data security and privacy. This incident quickly became the focus, triggering extensive public discussions on personal data security and AI ethics, and also had a certain impact on the reputation of Kingsoft WPS.
Recently, many netizens posted on social media platforms pointing out that Kingsoft’s WPS Office office software is suspected of sharing documents written by users to ByteDance’s Doubao AI for training. The accusation sparked widespread attention and discussion.
According to reports, many users reported on platforms such as Weibo and Xiaohongshu that they found that the content of unreleased documents had been mastered by Doubao AI. These include contracted authors of the Tomato novel platform. They said that the updated content of unpublished books they wrote locally was accurately cited by Doubao AI, which raised their concerns about data leaks.
Faced with these doubts, Kingsoft WPS officially issued a statement denying it through Weibo. The statement emphasized that WPS has taken strict measures to prevent unauthorized disclosure of user information, and made it clear that all user documents will not be used for any AI training purposes, nor will they be used for any purpose without the user's consent. scene.
In addition, Kingsoft WPS also specifically emphasized that the company has not conducted any AI-level cooperation with Doubao AI, a subsidiary of ByteDance, and there is no situation where documents are used for AI training.
This incident triggered widespread public discussion on personal data security and AI ethics. At present, the relevant investigation is still ongoing, and the specific situation needs to be further verified.
Although Kingsoft WPS’s statement denied the accusation, the incident itself has triggered in-depth public thinking on data security and AI ethics. The results of the follow-up investigation will have a key impact on the direction of the incident and will also serve as a warning to the development and application of other similar software. Users should also be vigilant, use relevant software with caution, and protect the security of personal data.