Antropic recently released version 2.1 of Claude. However, its overemphasis on safety and ethics has led to a decrease in the ease of use of the model. Many users reported that Claude 2.1 refused to execute commands, causing dissatisfaction and cancellation of subscriptions by paying users. This move triggered a discussion in the industry on the trade-off between AI security and functionality. How to ensure AI security while taking into account user experience has become a new challenge for AI companies.
After the AI startup Antropic launched version 2.1 of Claude, many users found that Claude became difficult to use and often refused to execute commands. The reason is that Claude 2.1 follows the AI Constitution released by Antropic and is more cautious in terms of safety and ethics. This has led to many paying users expressing strong dissatisfaction and preparing to cancel their subscriptions. Industry insiders worry that Antropic sacrifices some model performance to ensure AI safety, which may put it at a disadvantage in the increasingly fierce AI competition.
Claude 2.1 version caused controversy, highlighting the difficult balance between safety and practicality in the development of AI. Antropic needs to find better solutions in future versions to remain competitive in the fierce market competition and meet user needs.