If you want others to be nice to you, you must first be nice to others, otherwise it is an unreasonable request. This principle is most appropriate when applied to the relationship between our website and Baidu. If we want Baidu to give our website a good ranking, we are also obliged to build the content of the website before asking for it. Original content can be said to be the best contribution to the development of search engines and even the Internet. So what is Baidu’s attitude towards originality?
Whose original is it?
There is a saying on the Internet that if we want to publish an original article, we should first publish it to our own site for a period of time, and then publish it to a large platform for people to reprint. Personally, I think it is best to post it to our own site first and wait for it to be included in Baidu before posting it to other platforms. But another problem arises. For example, if we post it to our own blog first, and then post it to a platform like A5 after it is included, A5 may not necessarily review it for us. So there will be a tangled question, should we maintain the originality of our site, or should the article be reprinted in large numbers? This can also determine who is the original author. I personally think that the article submitted to A5 will be ignored. original. In the eyes of Baidu Spider, if there is a copyright link in the article, it just tells it that this article is helping to promote this domain name, and the article is recommending this domain name, so our domain name can also be assigned corresponding weight. Of course, this method only refers to the soft articles we submitted. As for the original articles you actually write on your site, of course they are considered your own site. There is another reason, that is, the themes of the domain name sites we promote are generally not about SEO or website building technology. And platforms like A5 do have columns like search SEO. So why the submitted soft article is considered to be A5 original. This is the personal opinion of who is original.
Tolerance for reprinting of original work
Personally, I think Baidu is very tolerant of originality, which means that webmasters can copy and paste content. This is due to both practical problems and Baidu’s own algorithm. The practical reason is that it is impossible for every site and everyone on the Internet to create and publish original content. The reason for its own algorithm is that if the article is completely prevented from being reprinted, then there will be no standard for how to judge the value of an article. The more it is reprinted, the more it proves the originality of an article and the higher its value. But I personally think that Baidu also has a limit to the reprinting of original articles. This is why when we search for the title of an article on Baidu to see the number of pages that have been reprinted and included, we see more than 100 results, but Baidu will have a prompt "Tip: In order to provide the most relevant results, we have omitted For some items with similar content, click here to see all search results." Also, for example, 150 relevant results can be found in the first few days, but only 100 relevant results or less will be found in the next few days. From personal experience, an article is reprinted 30-60 times, which is a very good number. In other words, when we build a website, it is very good to add some information that has not been published by a large number of websites. It is better than publishing some pseudo-original or artificially reversed articles that have a much higher probability of being included and given a greater weight. Therefore, when you use the website group software or the skycc combination marketing software in the multi-faceted network marketing software to collect content, it is best not to select the pseudo-original options for titles and content. Just use its quick collection function and publish it on your site or blog. By doing this, you are disseminating Internet content and contributing to the Internet. And by making it pseudo-original, you are messing up Internet content and poisoning the Internet. Because such article information cannot be read at all.
The above two aspects are my personal opinions on Baidu's attitude towards originality. I hope it will be of some help to everyone. The source of the article is Xinyu Talent Network http://www.xinyurc.com. Please keep the link to the original author when reprinting. This is also a kind of support for originality. Author QQ 975687671 Welcome to communicate.
Editor-in-Chief: Yangyang author Feng Zhizi’s personal space