In the process of operating a website, we often revise the version or title due to different needs, but this often brings devastating results. Most of the time, the website will be demoted, so that it will be dark for a long time, waiting hard. recover. Basically everyone has encountered this situation, and I am no exception. Recently, when I was running the Wuhan SEO blog, some previous plans needed to be changed, so the website was revised to a certain extent, including the title. Unfortunately, it caught up with the big update three days later and was instantly killed. The homepage had already flown to Mars.
This forced me to reflect on whether there was a safer way to revise the version, so I experimented with two other new sites, tested a lot, and finally found a very effective way. I would like to share it with you here. Students who need to revise the version may wish to give it a try.
We know that after changing the title, the most likely situation is that the homepage is not on the first or first page, and the ranking disappears. In serious cases, you can't find the homepage directly in Baidu. If you can skip this process, let Baidu crawl and include your latest page in the fastest time. So will this problem be effectively solved? If so, how can Baidu include new pages as quickly as possible?
Based on this consideration, during the test of the new website, the titles of the two websites were modified at the same time, as well as the home page was significantly revised. After making the changes, immediately go to Baidu's complaint center to complain about the snapshot of the website, because the snapshot complaint function provided by Baidu can immediately update your snapshot to the latest status at that time. So if nothing unexpected happens, as long as there are complaints, the revised homepage can directly skip Baidu's natural inclusion or de-righting process, and directly capture, include and release it.
Three hours later, I found that the two sites where I complained had indeed been updated to the latest snapshots. But this is not enough to explain the problem at this time, because it cannot be determined that it is a stable result. While maintaining updates and external links, we continued dynamic tracking over the next two weeks and found no abnormalities. I introduced this method to some friends and the test results were all very satisfactory. Therefore, it can basically be judged that this is very effective in dealing with revision and reduction of rights.
Of course, if the weight of the website is high enough, the impact of the revision will be low. This method is more used when the weight of the website is not very stable, and it is recommended not to complain too frequently, and only complain after all changes are completed. And this cycle is generally not more than one day.
This article is provided by Liu Dan@武汉seo, the website is http://www.liudan1984.com/ , and you are welcome to reprint it.
Editor in charge: Yangyang author dannuo's personal space