As we all know, we currently have more and more open source programs for building websites, such as Dreamweaver, Empire, php168, etc. for CMS, Discuz, PHPWIND, etc. for forums, Zblog, Wordpss, etc. for blogs, all of which provide users with Free to download and use. These are just a few well-known programs. Of course, there are many unknown programs. For us grassroots webmasters, these current open source programs are enough for us to choose and use. What kind of source code should we choose to build a website? , at present, most webmasters mainly consider two points: first, from the perspective of SEO, see whether the source code is easy to optimize and include, and whether it supports static generation; second, consider the future scalability and security of the source code. When the website becomes larger, it can Is it a good expansion upgrade?
Judging from the major source code programs with the most users on the market, the security of the source code is relatively good. Source code developers can upgrade and patch the programs in a timely manner. Grassroots webmasters basically have nothing to worry about; from an SEO perspective You see, static has always been considered the most suitable for building websites, and webmasters who understand SEO are the first choice to generate static source code. Today, Qingdao SEO will talk about the relationship between website source code and SEO based on his own experience. It may not be correct, it is purely a personal opinion.
Here I will directly state my position: "What kind of source code should I choose? I think the one that is suitable is the best!" Why do I say this? There are many webmasters, especially new webmasters who have not been in contact with the website for a long time. They think that only Only websites that can generate static websites can rank well, include more content, and are easy to optimize, so they will be favored by search engines. The most representative source code here is Dreamweaver CMS. Currently, the most webmasters use Dreamweaver to build websites. But I disagree with the ideas of these webmasters. This is not to say that Dreamweaver CMS is not good, but that Dreamweaver CMS is indeed very good. I am not the only one who says it is good, many people say it is good, because I am also using it now.
But I want to tell some webmasters from the perspective of SEO that static and non-static are not the main factors for good rankings and more inclusions. Sometimes when I see a source code, I feel that the style is really good, but if I look carefully, it is a pity that the source code is ASP and does not support generation. Static, I thought if I could generate static like Dreamweaver, I would use this program, but it’s a pity... It is estimated that many webmasters have encountered this problem when looking for source code to build a website. In my opinion, the main reason why I chose Dreamweaver is that its scalability is better. I really don’t care whether it can generate static . I have been engaged in SEO for two years, and I have worked on many websites that have been SEOed for others and I have built my own websites. I found that many of these websites are not well-known source code, let alone static, but the websites are included and ranked very well. Okay, the function of the website is also very simple, and it looks very beautiful. Wait~ Take my earliest website as an example. It used the old Y’s CMS program. I simply modified it later. The characteristic of the old Y program is that it is simple. Easy to use, ASP pseudo-static. When I first chose this program, I thought it was easy to use because I didn’t know code at that time, let alone SEO. I could only add an article, so I used this program. Now my website is The rankings are also very good, and there are a lot of inclusions, and the postings are included very quickly. Even if I copy 10 articles from elsewhere at once, the search engines will take them all within 10 minutes. It is no exaggeration.
Maybe you will say that the static source code I used is not that good. Is the so-called static source code nothing to do with SEO? If I post today, it will be included tomorrow or the next day at the earliest. Similarly, my current program is the Dreamweaver program. If I post today, it will be included tomorrow or many days later. From this, we can see that whether a website is included or not has little direct relationship with the source code, and the ranking of the website has little to do with it. The main reason depends on the comprehensive weight of the website, the time to build the website, the number of external links, original content, user experience, etc. All play an important role in the weight of the website. Therefore, grassroots webmasters should choose source code to build their website. Don’t waste a lot of our precious time because they can’t find the source code, and don’t spend more money to find someone to compile a dynamic program. Change it to static. It is troublesome for many websites to generate static. You have to click generate every time, and you have to generate again when you modify the content. Remember, as long as it meets the functional requirements we use and feels beautiful, it is enough.
Many webmasters have thrown brickbats at me when I said that SEO has nothing to do with the website source code. SEO optimization does have something to do with the source code, but it is not as big a relationship as some webmasters paranoidly believe. A website that cannot be static is not a good website. There will be no good rankings. This is very wrong! As the saying goes, whatever suits you is the best! Everything depends on you taking good care of the website and working hard to cultivate the authority of the website.
This article was originally created by Qingdao SEO. When reprinted by Qingdao Wedding Network www.0532hq.com, please indicate the author’s copyright.
Thanks to Qingdao Wedding Network for your contribution